NJDEP’s Regulation of PFNA Must Proceed Through Rulemaking

December 21, 2017
John F. Gullace
MGKF Special Alert

On December 19, 2017, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, issued an unpublished opinion in Chemistry Council of New Jersey v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, No. A-1439-15T4, that invalidated the Interim Specific Ground Water Quality Criteria (ISGWQC) for perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) adopted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). 

In the litigation, NJDEP maintained that the ISGWQC for PFNA was properly adopted pursuant to N.J.A.C. 7:9C-1.7(c), but the court disagreed because the same rule requires an interim standard to be “replaced with specific criteria as soon as reasonably possible by rule.”  N.J.A.C. 7:9C-1.7(c)(2)(ii).  The court observed that NJDEP first established an ISGWQC for PFNA by publication through its website in March of 2014 and NJDEP could not claim the standards were still “interim.”  According to the court: “The record here shows that these interim criteria have become de facto a permanent regulatory scheme without the agency complying with the requirements of the [Administrative Procedures Act] APA.  As such, these measures are declared invalid.”  Opinion at 15. 

However, the court also stayed the implementation of its decision for thirty days to give NJDEP an opportunity to appeal and/or begin the formal rulemaking process to establish groundwater standards for PFNA.  NJDEP is poised to regulate several other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.  The message from the court is that any effort by NJDEP to regulate these substances must more promptly trigger the formal rulemaking process under the APA, with its attendant opportunity for comment and, potentially, litigation.  The decision may also have implications for other types of NJDEP actions that do not go through formal rulemaking, or do not promptly proceed to rulemaking.  Interestingly, the case appears to be a pyrrhic victory for the Appellants because NJDEP initiated the court-required rulemaking for PFNA months before the decision was issued.  49 N.J.R. 596(a) (Apr. 3, 2017).

Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek