Update on OSHA’s New Injury-Reporting Provisions Involving Incentive Programs and Drug & Alcohol Testing

December 7, 2016
Jill Hyman Kaplan and James M. McClammer
MGKF Special Alert

As reported in our October Special Alert, due to a Motion for Preliminary Injunction in a case pending in the Northern District of Texas that challenges certain aspects of OSHA’s new injury-reporting regulations, OSHA delayed enforcement of these provisions until December 1, 2016.  (The case is Texo ABC/AGC, Inc. et al v. Perez, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:16-CV-1998-L.)  On November 28, 2016, the court issued an order denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, finding that Plaintiffs had not shown there would be irreparable harm if the court did not enter a nationwide injunction enjoining implementation of OSHA’s reporting rule.  The court also specified, however, that its ruling on the requested injunctive relief “is not a comment or indication as to whether the Defendants will ultimately prevail on the merits.” So, while the Plaintiffs could still eventually prevail, the Rule went into effect as of December 1, 2016.

The controversial and contested aspects of the regulations involve illustrative examples provided by OSHA in the Preamble to the Final Rule regarding incentive programs and drug and alcohol testing policies. OSHA views incentive programs that reward employees for no injuries or low injury rates (with a bonus or other type of prize) as discouraging employees from reporting injuries.  Similarly, OSHA considers drug and alcohol testing performed after an employee is injured, where drug or alcohol use is not likely to have contributed to the accident, as potentially discouraging the reporting of injuries or being used to retaliate against employees that report injuries.

Accordingly, if your company has incentive programs or drug and alcohol testing policies that potentially discourage the reporting of injuries, or such policies are sometimes implemented in a way that could be viewed as retaliatory, now is a good time to perform a review of such programs or policies to see if they run afoul of the new Rule.  Please contact Jill Hyman Kaplan at 484-430-2315 or James McClammer at 484-430-2334, if you need assistance in evaluating your company’s incentive programs or drug and alcohol testing policies.  

Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek