Storage tank cases often involve unique factual, technical and legal issues, including complex hydrogeological factors, and turn on both statutory presumptions and contract interpretation. We have handled numerous cases involving storage tanks, including cases involving abandoned tanks left behind decades earlier by prior owners, as well as tanks that have been improperly removed. We are also regularly involved in disputes between current and prior property owners, adjacent landowners, landlords and tenants, and government regulators. In addition, we represent clients in filing and pursuing claims with the Pennsylvania Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund (“USTIF”) and the New Jersey Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Remediation, Upgrade and Closure Fund.
Our experience involving storage tank litigation includes the following matters:
- Representing a client in one of the leading cases with a reported decision involving Pennsylvania's statutory presumption of liability under the Pennsylvania Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act. (Wack v. Farmland Industries, Inc., 744 A.2d 265 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999)).
- Successfully litigating issues of first impression for cost recovery under the Pennsylvania Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act.
- Representing a Fortune 100 client with maintenance facilities in New Jersey in two separate cases involving alleged contamination from storage tanks. One of these cases involved the retention of groundwater experts and a series of investigations of the numerous sites involved in the case. The other case involved gathering evidence of tank usage dating back to the 1950s and historical aerial photography.
- Representing a national gasoline retailer in administrative hearings to secure coverage from the Pennsylvania Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund.
- Recovering funds for current property owners from prior owners of sites where tanks associated with historical operations are at issue. In one such case, we recovered the full amount of the claim without filing suit and in another case reached a mutually acceptable determination of responsibility without filing suit.
- Defending a distributor of home heating oil in litigation resulting from releases of heating oil during delivery events.
- Representing a Pennsylvania college in federal court litigation instituted by neighboring property owner in asserting liability for remediation and damages in connection with leaking underground storage tanks.
- Representing a client in tank litigation who was not the owner of a tank, but was allegedly responsible for ancillary equipment that was claimed to have failed, resulting in a release. This representation was successfully resolved for the client years before the case concluded for many of the other parties.
- Successfully recovering cleanup costs against a prior property owner on behalf of a client who owned property where tanks had been in use decades earlier and then abandoned.
- Obtaining reversal of multiple coverage denials before USTIF.
- January 6, 2020
- October 3, 2019
- June 18, 2018
- Schiller Moderates ABA Webinar “An Update on Arranger Liability Under CERCLA: Recent Cases and the Impact of Pakootas”November 28, 2016
- September 19, 2011
- July 19, 2010
- John Gullace of Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP to Speak at American Bar Association Section on Environment, Energy, and Resources' Fall Law SummitSeptember 16, 2009
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- December 14, 2016An American Bar Association Webinar
- September 9, 2015CO-HOSTED BY MANKO, GOLD, KATCHER & FOX AND BL COMPANIES
- September 9, 2014Co-Hosted by Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox and BL Companies
- September 10, 2013
- September 24, 2019Law360
- October 1, 2013Pennsylvania State ChapterPublished by Matthew Bender
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 18, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- January 25, 2016
- August 18, 2015
- August 16, 2007
- New Jersey Appellate Division Holds Judicial Estoppel as Available Defense to Spill Act Claims for ContributionJanuary 10, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- NJ District Court Holds that Companies Cannot Knock Out Claim for Primary Restoration Natural Resource Damages under the Spill ActNovember 13, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- Company Waived Attorney-Client Privilege by Sharing Privileged Communication with Consultant, Superior Court HoldsJuly 30, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- New Jersey Appellate Division Applies Equitable Principles in Allocating Investigation Costs Between Neighboring PRPsMarch 10, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- New Jersey Appellate Division Holds Plaintiff Must Establish “Reasonable Nexus” to Recover Cleanup Costs under New Jersey Spill ActNovember 18, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- New Jersey Supreme Court Holds No Recovery For Storage Tank Leak Under Trespass or Private Nuisance Absent Owner MisconductAugust 19, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 10, 2015The Legal Intelligencer
- January 29, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 26, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 8, 2012Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel" - Top Ten