From single plaintiff suits to class actions, mass actions and multidistrict litigation, our team has defended manufacturers, landfill operators, suppliers, service providers and employers against claims for personal injury, death, medical monitoring, property damage and property value diminution resulting from contamination of a variety of environmental media, including air, water and soil. Our efforts often begin before these claims are even filed, proactively advising our clients on strategies to minimize liability, and continue in challenging the initial filings through trial and appellate proceedings. We have defended these matters working with both our in-house technical consultants and outside experts in fields such as toxicology, epidemiology, industrial hygiene, hydrogeology, geology and chemistry.
Photo © Leon1 | Dreamstime Stock Photos & Stock Free Images
The firm’s extensive experience in toxic tort defense and class action suits includes the following:
- Defending a large manufacturing client in all litigation in Pennsylvania involving toxic tort claims, both individual claims and class actions, arising from alleged exposures to hazardous substances emitted into the ambient air from manufacturing activities. Reported or published decisions include: Sheridan v. NKG Metals Corp., 609 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2010) (affirming summary judgment in medical monitoring class actions against representatives of two classes - residents for ambient air exposures and employees for occupational exposures); Pohl v. NGK Metals Corp., 2007 Pa. Super. 306, 936 A.2d 43 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007) (granting summary judgment against plaintiffs in medical monitoring claim upon showing that scientific evidence showed exposure to beryllium emissions did not create a significantly increased risk of contracting a serious latent disease); Vitalo v. Cabot Corp., 399 F.3d 536 (3d Cir. 2005) (granting summary judgment because undisputed facts established that plaintiff failed as a matter of law to exercise reasonable diligence to discover his chronic lung condition, and claim was barred by the statute of limitations); Sheridan v. Cabot Corp., No. 02-1212, 2003 WL 22999256 (E.D. Pa. 2003) (granting summary judgment because plaintiff diagnosed with lung disease failed to present evidence of impairment associated with that illness), aff'd, No. 03-1984, 113 F. Appx 444, 2004 WL 2360990 (3d Cir. 2004).
- Representing an operator of municipal waste landfills in numerous individual and class action tort claims, seeking property damage and diminution of property value as a result of operations of a permitted landfill.
- Representing a narrow tube manufacturer in claims asserted as a result of alleged emissions of chlorinated volatile organic compounds from manufacturing operations. The case was dismissed for failure to state a claim under the federal Clean Air Act.
- Litigating on behalf of a public utility in a lawsuit where plaintiffs sought medical monitoring on behalf of a putative class of residents allegedly exposed to elemental mercury from the removal of regulators.
- Representing a gasoline supplier in defense of a wrongful death action alleging that exposure to benzene in a private drinking water well caused adenocarcinoma, and obtaining summary judgment after plaintiff’s toxicologist was precluded from testifying about link between ingestion of benzene and decedent’s cancer. (Wack v. Farmland Industries, Inc. 744 A.2d 265 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999)).
- Representing a large manufacturing client in litigation in federal court involving claims by two dairy farmers that fluoride emissions from an ore processing facility damaged the productivity of dairy herds over a thirty-year period.
- Defending a battery company sued by a group of employees who alleged personal injuries as a result of a leaking battery at the work place.
Press Releases
- September 22, 2020
- September 15, 2020
- January 6, 2020
- October 3, 2019
- July 16, 2019
- January 7, 2019
- July 19, 2018
- June 18, 2018
- April 26, 2018
- May 9, 2017
- November 28, 2016
- August 17, 2015A Webcast for the American Law Institute
- May 4, 2015
- November 29, 2011
- November 16, 2011
- September 19, 2011
- September 7, 2011
- September 20, 2010
- July 19, 2010
- September 16, 2009
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- December 14, 2016An American Bar Association Webinar
- September 9, 2015CO-HOSTED BY MANKO, GOLD, KATCHER & FOX AND BL COMPANIES
- January 21, 2015A Strafford CLE webinar program
- June 24, 2014A Guide for Businesses and Property Owners
- December 8, 2012
- November 4, 2010Dealing with Claims and Discovery Issues
Media Coverage
- January 27, 2020Law360
- September 24, 2019Law360
- May 2, 2017Energy Intelligence's Natural Gas Week
Special Alerts
- May 28, 2020
- January 25, 2016
- August 18, 2015
- October 10, 2011
- January 8, 2010
- September 8, 2009
- January 8, 2009
- November 16, 2008
Articles
- November 5, 2020Law360
- September 14, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 3, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 20, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 1, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 22, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 26, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 28, 2020The Legal Intelligencer
- January 21, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 14, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 28, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 18, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 26, 2019The Legal Intelligencer
- October 11, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 27, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 24, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 24, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 21, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 19, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 30, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 8, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 15, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 26, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 16, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 6, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 15, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 3, 2016The Claims As Pled Were Time-BarredMGKF Litigation Blog
- October 31, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 26, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 20, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 7, 2016North Carolina Statute of Repose Is No Bar To SuitMGKF Litigation Blog
- March 1, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 1, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 3, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 20, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 17, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 11, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 16, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 16, 2014MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 9, 2014MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 13, 2014MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 21, 2014MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 23, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 13, 2013The Legal Intelligencer
- August 21, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 19, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 7, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 19, 2013The Legal Intelligencer
- November 8, 2012Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel" - Top Ten
- May 17, 2012Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel"
- September 1, 2011Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel"
- April 16, 2009The Legal Intelligencer