We have a broad range of experience handling environmental cost recovery, contribution, natural resource damages and citizen suit claims for both plaintiffs and defendants, including large and small companies, municipal entities and individuals, in federal and state courts. Our cases have involved large and complex sites with claims brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “Superfund”), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Oil Pollution Act, Pennsylvania Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act, Pennsylvania Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act, Pennsylvania Clean Streams Law, Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control Act, New Jersey Spill Act and New Jersey Environmental Rights Act. We have experience litigating claims with complicating factors such as corporate successor liability, bankruptcy and insolvency, orphan share allocation, condemnation proceedings, statutes of limitation defenses and indemnification obligations. We also regularly work with our in-house technical staff, outside consultants and experts, as well as our clients’ in-house technical personnel, and have tackled difficult claims involving complex scientific and engineering issues at landfills, contaminated sediment sites, and an array of current and former industrial facilities with historic contamination going back decades.
Photo © Robert Keenan | Dreamstime.com
Representative MGKF matters involving Cost Recovery, Superfund, Natural Resource Damages and citizen suit claims include the following:
- Defending subsidiaries of Tenneco, Inc. as both trial and appellate counsel in action brought by group of parties remediating a contaminated site in New Jersey; plaintiffs asserted statutory claims under the New Jersey Spill Act and common law contract claims; achieved successful summary judgment dismissal of statutory New Jersey Spill Act claims; proceeded to bench trial on remaining contract claims, and received judgment of no cause of action and dismissal of all remaining claims; successful defense of appeal before the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, which affirmed trial court judgment (AGIP USA Inc. et al., v. The Pullman Company et al., Union County, Dkt. No. L-3530-10, Appellate Div. Dkt. No. A-0173-16T1, 2020 WL 1908509, at *1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Apr. 20, 2020))
- Serving as lead counsel in one of the first multiple-party Superfund matters to be litigated through the allocation phase to judgment.
- Representing multiple clients in complex cost recovery litigation involving several hundred third-party defendants and relating to the remediation of contaminated sediment in the Lower Passaic River and adjacent water bodies in New Jersey.
- Representing the National Solid Waste Management Association in amicus briefing before the United States Supreme Court on successor liability issues under CERCLA.
- Defending a specialty metals manufacturer as appellate counsel in a CERCLA private cost recovery action, resulting in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacating a $13 million verdict entered in favor of the plaintiffs by the trial court. (Agere Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Environmental Technology Corp., 602 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010)).
- Acting as special counsel in a CERCLA cost recovery action brought by a commercial property owner for contamination resulting from the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
- Defending a specialty chemicals company in a CERCLA cost recovery action brought by EPA, resulting in the dismissal of the federal government’s claims with prejudice. (United States v. Rohm and Haas, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99585 (D.N.J. Sept. 22, 2010)).
- Representing a potentially responsible party in connection with compliance and performance of an Administrative Order on Consent and related allocation proceedings involving costs in excess of $30 million.
- Successfully defending a federal Clean Water Act citizen suit filed against a municipal sewer authority, which was dismissed by the district court and affirmed on appeal. (P.E.D.F. v. Borough of Kennett Square, 175 F. 3d 1011 (3d Cir. Feb. 18, 1999)).
- Representing a national waste management company in a high profile Superfund case featured on 60 Minutes, and settling the case after 5 years of litigation through a unique consent decree with mixed government funding and the use of an innovative remedial technology.
- Defending a specialty chemicals company in third-party CERCLA contribution and cost recovery claims against the former owner and operator of a brake manufacturing facility; resulting in the complete dismissal of all third-party claims on summary judgment. (United States v. D.S.C. of Newark Enter., Inc. et al., No. 09-2270, 2013 WL 2658929 (D.N.J. June 12, 2013)).
- Defending a publicly traded real estate investment trust in cost recovery and natural resource damage claims throughout New Jersey arising out of the company's ownership and/or leasehold interest in gasoline service stations.
- Obtaining summary judgment for a university in a cost recovery action filed under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act.
- Prosecuting environmental cost recovery actions on behalf of a number of clients, including a large regional convenience store chain and a national retail pharmacy chain, against former owners and owners of neighboring properties.
- Representing consultants and remedial action contractors involved in remediation activities at contaminated sites, who were sued by the potentially responsible parties at those sites.
- Representing an international chemical company in actions seeking natural resource damages arising out of the company's alleged disposal of waste at landfills subject to ongoing remediation.
- Defending multiple clients in private party contribution actions brought under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act in single site and multi-party litigation.
- Representing a commercial property tenant in an action brought by a third-party plaintiff seeking contribution for alleged natural resource damages to groundwater.
- Representing the primary defendant in a natural resource damages action where the government sought more than 800 acres of land in compensation for alleged natural resource damages.
- Obtaining dismissal of a federal citizen suit claim under the Clean Water Act on behalf of a municipal sewer authority. (Thompson v. Horsham Township, 576 F. Supp. 2d 681 (E.D. Pa. 2008)).
- Representing a large regional utility in a citizen suit filed by non-profit organizations in federal court in Connecticut for alleged Clean Air Act violations.
- Defending a national solid waste company in a federal citizen suit filed under the Clean Water Act alleging illegal discharges into the Delaware River.
- Obtaining dismissal of a Clean Air Act citizen suit filed in federal court against a manufacturing company for alleged unlawful air emissions.
Special Alerts
- March 21, 2024
- March 15, 2024
- January 18, 2023
- January 18, 2023
- January 18, 2023
- January 18, 2023
- December 15, 2022
- March 16, 2022
- January 14, 2022
- January 14, 2022
- January 14, 2022
- January 14, 2022
- January 14, 2022
- November 22, 2021
- February 9, 2021COVID-19 UPDATE
- January 12, 2021
- January 11, 2021
- January 11, 2021
- August 20, 2020COVID-19 Update
- April 27, 2020COVID-19 Update
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- November 4, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- August 6, 2018
- August 6, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- January 23, 2017
Articles
- July 15, 2024MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 6, 2024MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 13, 2024MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 29, 2024MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 31, 2024MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 31, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 30, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 9, 2023The Legal Intelligencer
- September 29, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 22, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 29, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 11, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- Court Finds Navajo Nation’s NRD Recovery Under CERCLA May Be Limited, But Not Its State Law RecoveryApril 28, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 23, 2023MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 9, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 2, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 4, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 29, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 26, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 22, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 1, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 22, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 20, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 27, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 9, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 29, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 5, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 7, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 17, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 18, 2022MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 10, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 24, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 20, 2021MGFK Litigation Blog
- September 30, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 10, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 26, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 24, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 16, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 12, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 7, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 25, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 15, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 12, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 28, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 23, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 23, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 8, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 13, 2020The Legal Intelligencer
- October 26, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 22, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 23, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 16, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 18, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 10, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 7, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 4, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 28, 20202020 Natural Resources & Environment by the American Bar Association
- July 14, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 11, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 23, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 22, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 21, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 17, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 15, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 3, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 3, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 21, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 9, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 23, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 26, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 18, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 3, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 3, 2019The Legal Intelligencer
- September 12, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 12, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 5, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 30, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- June 4, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 20, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 22, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 28, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 7, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 11, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 29, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 10, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 17, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 4, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 21, 2018New Jersey Law Journal
- November 19, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 11, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 10, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 8, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 17, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 6, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 14, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- April 17, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 5, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 1, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 24, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 19, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 16, 2017The Legal Intelligencer
- November 13, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 24, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 16, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 9, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 3, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 30, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 20, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- May 18, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 29, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 10, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 16, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 10, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 9, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 21, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 15, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 2, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 25, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 17, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 4, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 6, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 28, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 26, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
Press Releases
- August 15, 2024
- August 1, 2023
- November 4, 2021
- August 19, 202117 Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox Attorneys Listed in 2022 Best Lawyers and Ones to Watch
- June 14, 2021
- May 24, 2021
- May 4, 2021
- May 3, 2021
- March 29, 2021
- November 5, 2020
- October 23, 2020
- October 20, 2020MGKF Partners Play Key Roles on Committee
- September 22, 2020
- September 15, 2020
- Bruce Katcher Named the Best Lawyers® 2021 Environmental Law “Lawyer of the Year” in Cherry Hill, NJAugust 20, 202016 Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox Attorneys Included in Best Lawyers 2021 and Four Named to Inaugural Ones to Watch List
- June 8, 2020Gotanda, McCabe, Moshang and Schiller Included in Top 50 Women Pennsylvania Listing
- April 30, 2020
- January 6, 2020
- November 4, 2019
- October 3, 2019
- September 26, 2019
- October 22, 2018
- July 19, 2018
- June 25, 2018Legal and Technical Perspectives
- April 26, 2018
- January 2, 2018Protecting PRP Interests in Contribution and Cost Recovery Process
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- February 27, 2018
- January 9, 2018Protecting PRP Interests in Contribution and Cost Recovery Process
- December 14, 2016An American Bar Association Webinar
- September 22, 2016
- June 15, 2016ABA Section of Environment, Energy and Resources' Superfund Master Class
- January 21, 2015A Strafford CLE webinar program
- February 10, 2014
- December 11, 2013Reducing Liability Amid Uncertainty and Absent Clear Guidance
- April 4, 2012
- December 9, 2010
- November 4, 2010Dealing with Claims and Discovery Issues
- August 5, 2010
Media Coverage
- January 6, 2022ABA SEER Trends (52:3), January/February 2022
- May 19, 2020Law360
- October 15, 2019for the ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources
- September 24, 2019Law360