Our wastewater permitting practice includes the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES"), pretreatment, and wastewater treatment plant construction permitting programs and, as applicable, permitting by certain interstate regulatory authorities.
NPDES Permit Program
The NPDES permit program was initially established pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act, but in most states has been federally delegated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and is largely administered by the states, although EPA retains some limited permit review authority. The program governs the discharge of pollutants via point sources into waters of the United States, including wastewater discharges from pipes, ditches, and similar conveyances.
A companion to the NPDES permit program is the pretreatment program applicable to companies that discharge their wastewater to publicly owned treatment works ("POTWs") rather than to surface waters, and requires POTWs to develop and enforce the pretreatment requirements.
Treatment Plant Construction
Wastewater treatment plants that are designed to meet NPDES or pretreatment discharge standards are often subject to state construction permitting requirements. We represent clients in connection with the permitting of these facilities in much the same manner as with the underlying discharge permits. Further information on this aspect of our practice as it relates to POTWs can be found at the sewage facilities page of our website.
NPDES Permit Program
Our experience in the NPDES permit practice includes the following:
- We have assisted clients in preparing NPDES permit applications, focusing on issues relating to the scope of the necessary information requirements as well as sensitivity to capturing the benefits of the NPDES "permit shield" found in the Clean Water Act and comparable protections under state law.
- A parallel approval program administered by the Delaware River Basin Commission ("DRBC"), an interstate commission made up of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Delaware, and the federal government, has also been a focal point of our practice. Clients often seek advice on the interplay between the NPDES permit program, EPA's retained review permit authority, and DRBC's asserted jurisdiction.
- We also assist clients in reviewing draft NPDES permits, in an effort to more thoroughly evaluate proposed conditions. This often brings into play state water quality standards, federal effluent limitation guidelines, and Total Maximum Daily Loads ("TMDLs").
- As a consequence of the expanded state and federal governmental effort to establish TMDLs, it is also an important focus of our practice. In representing numerous clients faced with TMDL-based requirements, we have gained considerable experience in understanding the programmatic aspects of TMDLs as well as the development of specific waste load allocations (for point source dischargers) and load allocations (for non-point source dischargers) in a variety of contexts. Most notably, we have been heavily involved in the development and implementation of TMDLs for toxic pollutants in the Delaware Estuary and nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
- Through the expansion of the NPDES permit program to cover stormwater discharges, we have an active practice advising industrial and developer clients on applicable stormwater permitting requirements.
- Where it becomes necessary to challenge agency permitting decisions, whether in the context of a permit denial or imposition of inappropriate conditions, we have successfully represented clients in pursuing permit appeals and in defending appeals brought by third parties.
- We have successfully defended a wide variety of clients in response to enforcement actions arising out of alleged violations of NPDES wastewater discharge permits and regulations brought by state and federal regulators as well as private actions grounded in federal and state citizen suit provisions.
Our practice under the pretreatment program includes the following:
- Many of our clients discharge to POTWs and are subject to specific pretreatment requirements and permits. We assist these clients in obtaining and complying with the pretreatment permits and associated requirements.
- Each of the pretreatment authorities has the ability to take enforcement action and impose penalties, thereby raising the potential for significant liability. We have defended clients against enforcement actions, including penalty proceedings and actions seeking the installation of additional control equipment or the cessation of noncompliant discharges.
- Compliance with pretreatment requirements can often become quite complicated because of EPA's close oversight and the pressure on the municipal treatment plant operators to maintain compliance with the NPDES permits issued for their facilities. We have represented municipal authorities in developing pretreatment programs to maintain compliance with their NPDES permits.
- March 31, 2017
- April 26, 2016
- February 3, 2015
- November 11, 2014
- Gold to Speak at the Fall Conference of the Delaware Section of the AWRA and the WRA of the Delaware River BasinOctober 27, 2014
- MGKF's Jonathan Spergel and Michael Gross Guest Speakers at 2013 PA Brownfields Conference on December 11November 19, 2013“The Real Estate Hibernation Has Ended—What Developers Need to Know About Key Environmental Regulatory Changes in the Post-Recession Economy”
- October 16, 2012
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- February 27, 2018
- September 9, 2015CO-HOSTED BY MANKO, GOLD, KATCHER & FOX AND BL COMPANIES
- September 9, 2014Co-Hosted by Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox and BL Companies
- September 17, 2013The Legal Intelligencer
- January 12, 2021
- January 11, 2021
- EPA’s Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 5 to Include an Expanded List of PFAS Constituents and Additional Public Water SystemsJanuary 11, 2021
- April 20, 2020COVID-19 Update
- January 21, 2020
- January 21, 2020
- January 14, 2019
- January 14, 2019
- January 18, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- April 25, 2017
- May 16, 2016
- March 28, 2016
- Proposed Revisions to the New Jersey Water Quality Management Planning Rule Likely to be Finalized in 2016January 25, 2016
- January 6, 2015
- September 15, 2014
- July 14, 2010
- May 8, 2010
- March 4, 2010
- November 13, 2009
- September 8, 2009
- May 8, 2009
- Pennsylvania Court Holds that Clean Water Act and Clean Streams Law are not Comparable, Permitting Citizens Suit to ProceedFebruary 23, 2021MGKF Litigation Blog
- Supreme Court Establishes "Functional Equivalent” Standard for Permitting Discharges to Groundwater Under the Clean Water ActApril 23, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- Ninth Circuit Affirms Lower Court Decision to Apply Constructive Submission Doctrine and Compel EPA to Issue a Temperature TMDL for Rivers in Washington and OregonJanuary 9, 2020MGKF Litigation Blog
- Commonwealth Court Upholds Environmental Hearing Board’s Denial of Sierra Club’s Fee Petition in Third-Party Permit ChallengeJune 25, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 11, 2019MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 21, 2018New Jersey Law Journal
- November 19, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 8, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- PA Supreme Court Addresses Agency Deference and the ERA in Ruling on Unconventional Well Drilling RegulationsJune 26, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 2, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 22, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- Court Finds the Clean Water Act Covers Discharges to Groundwater Hydrologically Connected to Surface Waters, But Requires Monitoring Instead of PenaltiesMarch 29, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- February 10, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 11, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- December 31, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- November 11, 2014Authored by Jonathan E. Rinde
- November 11, 2014Co-authored by Jonathan E. Rinde and Michael Dillon
- January 4, 2011Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel"