MGKF works extensively with clients to navigate the legal, technical, and practical aspects of contaminated site remediation projects under state cleanup programs. These projects encompass brownfield redevelopments through voluntary cleanup programs, as well as cleanups at active commercial and industrial facilities pursuant to state enforcement authorities.
The presence or potential presence of contaminated soil, groundwater, indoor air, or other environmental media—whether due to recent spills or historic site activities—can complicate the use and development of real property, hinder project financing, and impose cleanup liability on site owners, occupants, and other parties. MGKF's attorneys and in-house technical consultants possess decades of combined experience counseling clients on all aspects of site remediation issues. We assist clients to find thorough, practical, and cost-effective cleanup solutions, resulting in state approvals consistent with business objectives and protective of human health and the environment.
Our familiarity with state cleanup programs is broad as well as deep, including completion of numerous projects under the Pennsylvania Land Recycling Program and New Jersey's Site Remediation Program and Industrial Site Recovery Act ("ISRA"). MGKF's knowledge stems in part from helping to shape these programs through involvement on agency advisory boards and by drafting client comments on bills and proposed rulemakings. Among these activities, the firm was significantly involved in developing the Pennsylvania Land Recycling Program's cornerstone legislation, the Land Recycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act of 1995 ("Act 2"), along with the Act 2 regulations and policy guidance. It has also played a role in New Jersey’s successful transition to the Licensed Site Remediation Professional program through the participation of one of its partners on Governor Christie’s environmental transition team that supported the prompt and full implementation of the reforms enacted under the May 2009 New Jersey Site Remediation Reform Act.
Elements of our state cleanup program practice include the following:
Consultant and Contractor Retention: MGKF has worked with scores of environmental consulting firms and remediation contractors on state cleanup program projects. We have also worked with licensed environmental professionals in states like New Jersey that have privatized the oversight of site remediation projects. We advise clients on selecting such firms and professionals, using our experience to suggest the right "fit" between a particular consultant or contractor and each site's contamination issues and intended use. The firm drafts requests for proposals, evaluates statements of qualifications and bids, and counsels clients on the final selection process. MGKF also routinely reviews and negotiates consultant and contractor retention agreements on clients' behalf.
Site Investigation Review: Based on our experience with contamination scenarios at a variety of sites—ranging from corner service stations and dry cleaners, to agricultural properties, to major industrial facilities such as refineries and manufactured gas plants—MGKF works with the client's consultant to design appropriate, cost-effective, and comprehensive strategies to investigate contamination at each property. Our uncommon mix of legal and technical expertise helps to ensure that the number, location, and type of soil borings and groundwater monitoring wells installed, laboratory analytical suites run, and other aspects of site investigations will accurately characterize contamination and comply with all relevant state cleanup program statutes, regulations, and guidance documents.
Data Evaluation and Remedial Strategy: Upon receipt of data, MGKF helps clients understand the magnitude of any regulated substances detected in the context of state cleanup standards relevant to the intended use of the property, separating real contamination issues from insignificant ones. Our attorneys and technical consultants then work with the client's consultant, EH&S staff, land planners and architects, and other team members to devise an overall remediation strategy to achieve closure under the state cleanup program efficiently and consistent with business objectives. We frequently counsel clients on remediation projects involving diverse issues such as soil excavation and disposal, groundwater treatment, pathway elimination through capping and other engineering controls, and mitigation of vapor intrusion risks from soil or groundwater impacted by volatile organic compounds.
Agency and Licensed Professional Interaction: Over the years MGKF has worked closely with regulatory agency officials on state cleanup program projects. In many cases, our attorneys and technical consultants discuss site investigation results and remedial strategy directly with agency technical and legal staff, both through informal calls and scheduled project meetings. These interactions help obtain up-front agency concurrence on the remediation and use/redevelopment approach, moving cleanup projects ahead with fewer surprises. In states like New Jersey, where oversight of remediation projects is privatized, we regularly deal with licensed environmental professionals to help ensure that cleanups not only protect the public health and environment, but also achieve the client’s risk management objectives in a cost-effective manner.
Report Review: We routinely review draft reports prepared by clients' consultants before submittal to state cleanup program staff, licensed environmental professionals (where applicable) and the public. These reviews focus on compliance with relevant state requirements and sensitivity to confidentiality and liability issues, while maintaining the integrity of the consultant's (or licensed professional’s) technical opinions and recommendations. We also help to prepare any required forms and notices to accompany submissions.
Public Involvement: In some instances, state cleanup programs require public involvement in site remediation and reuse plans. Even when not required, public involvement may be important to the success of a remediation and/or redevelopment project. MGKF helps clients evaluate whether public involvement may be required or prudent, and strategize how best to design and implement an effective public involvement process. Typical services include drafting informational correspondence and fact sheets, planning and overseeing public meetings, and preparing formal public comment-and-response documents.
Institutional Control Preparation: Remediation projects often involve exposure pathway elimination, such as through capping and other engineering controls or prohibitions on residential land uses or groundwater ingestion. State cleanup programs and companion laws like the increasingly widespread Uniform Environmental Covenants Act (UECA) require that such remedies be embodied in legal documents—which may include deed notices and restrictions, environmental covenants, and even planned community or condominium public offering statements and declarations—to ensure proper notice and enforceability with respect to current and future site occupants. Our attorneys draft such institutional controls carefully to comply with legal requirements and minimize potential reopening of a completed cleanup, while putting the contamination and remediation information into appropriate context for site users, future purchasers, and the general public.
The following are just a few examples of MGKF state cleanup program matters:
- MGKF has worked with a residential developer, its outside engineers and environmental consultants on several significant urban infill brownfield redevelopment projects in Philadelphia. Among other tasks, the firm has advised on investigations and cleanup strategies at these sites to attain appropriate remediation standards under Pennsylvania's Act 2 program; presented remediation and reuse plans to Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, municipal, and neighborhood representatives; reviewed draft Act 2 reports; and prepared environmental disclosures and land use restrictions where required by Act 2, condominium and planned community acts, or other laws.
- The firm represented a residential and commercial developer in connection with a 300-plus acre mixed-use commercial and residential redevelopment in the New Jersey Pinelands. The project included remediating an old landfill under New Jersey's Site Remediation Program, closing a second landfill under the state's solid waste program and installing an array of solar panels on the landfill cap, investigating groundwater conditions, negotiating pollution legal liability insurance coverage, and securing state brownfields financial assistance.
- MGKF counsels a national retail client on remediation issues in the acquisition and redevelopment of former gas stations, dry cleaners, and other impacted properties. Tasks include, among others, evaluating procedural requirements and remedial options available in a relevant state's voluntary cleanup program, monitoring cleanup work by the client's contractors and consultants, and drafting any needed deed restrictions or other institutional controls.
- We frequently work with Licensed Site Remediation Professionals (“LSRPs”) retained by our clients on site remediation projects in New Jersey. We have been called on to assist clients in selecting, contracting with and monitoring the activities of the LSRP and to provide legal input in a variety of circumstances including the applicability and extent of public notice and agency reporting obligations, negotiating access to neighboring properties, interpreting legal requirements in agency technical regulations and identifying instances where variances from those regulations or agency guidance may be appropriate.
- The firm has represented many clients in satisfying the unique requirements of New Jersey's ISRA program, which requires that sellers comply with an environmental clearance process in conveying most industrial properties. These cases have involved counseling clients on qualifying for exemptions from ISRA, remediating properties under ISRA, complying with ISRA’s procedural requirements in complex transactions, and securing expedited ISRA approvals to allow transactions to proceed in a timely manner.
- The firm assisted a Pennsylvania municipality to remediate a former fuel storage property for redevelopment as a public parking facility. Our services included preparing requests for proposal and evaluating bids from storage tank contractors and environmental consulting firms, collaborating with the contractor and consultant on investigation and remediation approaches, reviewing draft reports, and ensuring coordination between the environmental firms and redevelopment team. A release of cleanup liability was obtained through Pennsylvania's Act 2 program, and the redeveloped property is now a key element of the municipality's downtown revitalization efforts.
- MGKF helped an industrial client to remediate a closed chemical manufacturing facility contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The ultimate goal was to redevelop the property and an adjacent site as a "big box" retail facility while satisfying both New Jersey site remediation and federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act corrective action requirements for soils (via thermal treatment and capping) and groundwater (via extraction, pre-treatment, and discharge to a publicly owned treatment works).
- January 2, 2018Protecting PRP Interests in Contribution and Cost Recovery Process
- May 25, 2017
- MGKF Presented “Regulatory Issues Associated with Emerging Contaminants” at the Spring Conference of the American Institute of Professional GeologistsMay 9, 2017
- March 31, 2017
- Schiller Moderates ABA Webinar “An Update on Arranger Liability Under CERCLA: Recent Cases and the Impact of Pakootas”November 28, 2016
- July 19, 2016
- March 1, 2016With Speaking Engagements by Partners Joseph M. Manko, Bart E. Cassidy, Jonathan E. Rinde and Carol F. McCabe
- Campbell Provides the Litigation Perspective on Vapor Intrusion as Part of the “EPA Vapor Intrusion Guidance: Analysis and Application”August 17, 2015A Webcast for the American Law Institute
- Michael Meloy of Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox Named 2013 Best Lawyers Philadelphia Environmental Law Lawyer of the YearSeptember 18, 2012
- Suzanne Schiller, a partner at Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, to Speak at HB Litigation Conference: "Oil in the Gulf - Litigation and Insurance Coverage" Thursday, November 4 in Miami, FloridaSeptember 20, 2010
- John Gullace of Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP to Speak on Environmental Law Developments of 2009 and Trends for 2010January 18, 2010
- Bruce S. Katcher of Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP to Speak on New Jersey's New Site Remediation Reform ActJuly 20, 2009
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- February 27, 2018
- June 6, 2017a Strafford live webinar: 1:00 - 2:30 p.m. EDT
- December 14, 2016An American Bar Association Webinar
- September 22, 2016
- January 21, 2015A Strafford CLE webinar program
- February 10, 2014
- November 4, 2010Dealing with Claims and Discovery Issues
- December 21, 2017Law360
- January 18, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- January 18, 2018
- Changes in Federal Toxicity Values Prompts New Jersey to Revise Soil Remediation Standards; Other States Will FollowSeptember 21, 2017
- January 23, 2017
- January 22, 2017
- January 22, 2017
- January 22, 2017
- July 5, 2016
- June 23, 2016Critiques NJDEP Delay in Ranking of Hazardous Discharge Sites
- February 15, 2016
- January 25, 2016
- January 25, 2016
- NJ Legislature Fails to Pass Legislation Insulating Local Public Entities from Spill Act Claims, but the Efforts May Continue in 2016January 25, 2016
- January 25, 2016
- August 18, 2015
- Updated NJDEP Technical Guidance on Use of Fill Material and Off-Site Source Groundwater InvestigationJune 18, 2015
- March 27, 2014
- January 21, 2014
- November 7, 2011New Jersey LSRP and Site Remediation Reform
- August 8, 2010
- August 8, 2010
- March 1, 2018MGKF Litigation Blog
- First Circuit Affirms District Court's Grant of Summary Judgment In Favor Of Monsanto in PCB Property Contamination SuitDecember 19, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- NJ District Court Holds that Companies Cannot Knock Out Claim for Primary Restoration Natural Resource Damages under the Spill ActNovember 13, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- September 18, 2017The Legal Intelligencer
- June 8, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Finds Latent Property Contamination Triggers “Occurrence” Insurance Coverage Prior to Discovery of the ContaminationMay 1, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- March 30, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- New Jersey Appellate Division Applies Equitable Principles in Allocating Investigation Costs Between Neighboring PRPsMarch 10, 2017MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 17, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- Pennsylvania District Court Addresses Several Key Issues in Litigation of CERCLA Contribution Claims & Allocation of Response CostsApril 22, 2016ABA Section of Environment, Energy and ResourcesSuperfund and Natural Resource Damages Litigation Committee Regional Update
- February 1, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Allows Pre-Enforcement Review of DEP's Continuing-Violations Penalty Policy under the Clean Streams LawJanuary 5, 2016MGKF Litigation Blog
- New Jersey Appellate Division Holds Plaintiff Must Establish “Reasonable Nexus” to Recover Cleanup Costs under New Jersey Spill ActNovember 18, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- October 12, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- PA Supreme Court Rules Contamination and Stigma Relevant for Determining Fair Market Value for Tax AssessmentsOctober 2, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- January 29, 2015MGKF Litigation Blog
- July 24, 2014The Legal Intelligencer
- August 23, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- Third Circuit Holds That A Party Who Has Resolved Its Liability to the State Under State Law May Seek Contribution Under CERCLAAugust 22, 2013MGKF Litigation Blog
- August 10, 2012The Legal Intelligencer
- December 1, 2010Association of Corporate Counsel's "Green-house Counsel"